STANDARD LITERATURE LIST

InstrumentTitleMovementComposerArrangerFinalOptional FinalRangesOptional rangeDexterityRhythm TempoMisc.PianoUnderrepresented
euphoniumSvart Regn (Black Rain)
Torstein
Aagaard-Nilsen
880280302010UN
euphoniumTwo InsectsI. Dance of the Dragonfly
Torstein
Aagaard-Nilsen
800270241910UN
euphoniumTwo InsectsII. Moth in Love
Torstein
Aagaard-Nilsen
1000400302010UN
euphonium4 Lyriske StykkerI. Poco parlando sempre
Torstein
Aagaard-Nilsen
880310291810UN
euphonium4 Lyriske StykkerII. Recit. e molto rubato
Torstein
Aagaard-Nilsen
980380302010UN
euphonium4 Lyriske StykkerIII. Energico
Torstein
Aagaard-Nilsen
900300302010UN
euphonium4 Lyriske StykkerIV. Adagio
Torstein
Aagaard-Nilsen
4301806910UN
tubaEirik the Viking"
Torstein
Aagaard-Nilsen
940360282010UN
euphoniumBravura Variations
Adolphe
Adam
Earl
Louder
82028026208MN
tubaCanto VII for Solo TubaI. Quite Fast
Sam
Adler
930340301910UN
tubaCanto VII for Solo TubaII. Light, fluffy and quick
Sam
Adler
850280301710UN
tubaCanto VII for Solo TubaIII. Slowly and with greatexpression
Sam
Adler
7603603064UN
tubaCanto VII for Solo TubaIV. Fast and Triumphant
Sam
Adler
960360302010UN
tubaTubetudesI. Like a Happy Dance
Sam
Adler
300180570UN
tubaTubetudesII. Rather Pompous
Sam
Adler
29342126440UN
tubaTubetudesIII. Gently Singing
Sam
Adler
310190840UN
tubaTubetudesIV. Like a Waltz
Sam
Adler
330180960UN
tubaTubetudesV. Quite Fast, but Steady
Sam
Adler
260120590UN
tubaTubetudesVI. Rather Slowly andExpressively
Sam
Adler
5501803430UN
tubaTubetudesVII. With a Jaunty Bounce
Sam
Adler
4102109101UN
tubaTubetudesVIII. As Fast as Possible
Sam
Adler
4201909140UN
tubaKum Ba Yah (TGSS)
African Folk Song
Sandy
Feldstein
& Larry
Clark
18090540NAN
tubaOver My Head (TGSS)
African-American Spiritual
Sandy
Feldstein
& Larry
Clark
12040440NAY
tubaThis Little Light of Mine (TGSS)
African-American Spiritual
Sandy
Feldstein
& Larry
Clark
17090440NAY
tubaRock-a-my Soul (TGSS)
African-American Spiritual
Sandy
Feldstein
& Larry
Clark
17090440NAY
InstrumentTitleMovementComposerArrangerFinalOptional FinalRangesOptional rangeDexterityRhythm TempoMisc.PianoUnderrepresented

RATING SYSTEM for the ITEA Standard Literature List

Designed and created by Dr. Mark S. Cox

OVERVIEW

“Range” (40 points) is the most basic and critical element in choosing repertoire. Thus, it carries the most weight. The difficulty and types of intervals is the next factor in determining how challenging a work will be for a student. A soloist’s ability to navigate these intervals (what the committee termed “Dexterity” [30 points]) has a profound impact on how successful the performance will be. “Rhythm and Tempo” is self-explanatory and carries a numeric value of 20 points, realizing that there is often room for variation in tempo, depending on interpretation. Finally, “Miscellaneous” (10 points) includes items that are found in more advanced works that create additional challenges.

TUBA RANGE (40 POINTS MAXIMUM)

The basic tuba range (used consistently in early and intermediate works) extends from low B-flat to D in the staff. Within this basic range, the highest and lowest notes are determined and each half-step within the range receives one (1) point. Thus, a piece utilizing a range of a major third (B-flat to D, e.g.) would receive a number rating of 4. If the range of a work encompassed an octave, then it would receive a rating of 12. As would be expected, as range is extended, the level of difficulty increases. High range is more difficult to master than low range for most students, and the numerical values reflect this. Whenever a solo goes below or above the basic range as defined above, the starting numerical value is 16. Points are then added to this default number according to the chart. For example, a work that goes up to a D above middle C would receive 4 extra points. The total for the range would be 20 (16+4=20). A work that goes down to a low F would receive 6 extra points. The total would be 22 (16+6=22). If the range extends above and below the “basic range,” both values are added to the 16 default points. For example, a work with a range of low F to B-flat below middle C would receive 25 points (16+6+3 = 25). If the total surpasses the maximum, it automatically defaults to 40.

EUPHONIUM RANGE (40 POINTS MAXIMUM)

Points for range are more evenly distributed, although the low range is weighted somewhat more heavily than the high range. The basic range extends from B-flat to D above middle C. As above, when pieces go higher than the basic range, points are added according to the chart to the default number of 16. Pieces that extend lower than the basic range use either the “A” or “B” section of the chart, depending on whether the work requires four valves or not. For example a solo with the range of C below the staff to G above middle C would total 29 points (16 [basic] + 9 [low “B “ chart] + 4 [high chart] = 29). If the combined elements, added together, surpasses the maximum, the total automatically defaults to 40

DEXTERITY, RHYTHM AND TEMPO, MISCELLANEOUS

These become necessarily more subjective. The characteristics and point values are the same for both instruments.

DEXTERITY (30 POINTS MAXIMUM)

The most challenging interval (taking into consideration frequency and context) is used as the basis for awarding points. For example, if a piece contains primarily major thirds with one perfect fifth, the major third would be used as the primary interval (4 points). Additional points may be added for pieces that require medium or advanced dexterity in moving from note to note. Tempo, rhythms, and the composer’s style and writing all have the potential to affect this.

RHYTHM AND TEMPO (20 POINTS MAXIMUM)

In most (although not all) solos, rhythms can be narrowed down to a few that most consistently make up the fabric of the piece. The ratings are determined by choosing the two rhythmic elements that most characterize the piece. Easiest works will be characterized by the type of note, while more advanced pieces will more often be defined by rhythmic concepts (syncopation, jazz, e.g.). Additional points for medium or fast tempi are added to reach the final total. A beginner solo might use only quarter and half notes. If the tempo was slow, total points would be 3 (1+2=3). A more advanced solo might look like this: 32nd notes, syncopation, and fast tempo adds up to 16 (7 + 3 + 6 = 16). Note that points are capped at 20. If the individual elements added together surpass this, the total automatically defaults to 20.

MISCELLANEOUS (10 POINTS MAXIMUM)

This includes compositional techniques and details that increase the difficulty of the work. Pick as many as are applicable. Miscellaneous points are capped at 10. If the individual elements surpass this, the total automatically defaults to 10. These are advanced techniques; most beginner and intermediate pieces will not contain anything from this list.

OPTIONAL NOTE(S) RATING

Composers and/or publishers at times add “optional ” notes for tuba and euphonium players, usually up or down an octave. This can add a more bravura element to the music, or, conversely, provides an easier alternative to a challenging passage. When this occurs, the rating inclusive of the optional notes can be found under the header “Optional.” The ratings for the individual categories in which the notes occur are represented by the lower of the two numbers.

CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING STANDARD WORKS

Designed and created by Dr. Mark S. Cox

All three (3) criteria in the “Absolute Requirements” section must apply to the music.

Once these criteria have been met, then at least three (3) criteria from the “Additional Requirements” section must be selected before the work can be considered a standard work.

Absolute Requirements:
1. Does the music enhance and/or promote the advancement of the tuba or euphonium?
2. Does the music promote the highest level of artistry for the tuba or euphonium?
3. Does the music inspire further study or interest in the euphonium or tuba?

Additional Requirements
(minimum of three are required)

1. Is the music originally written for the tuba or euphonium?
2. Does the music have strong pedagogical value?
3. Has the music been professionally recorded?
4. Has the music received numerous public performances?
5. Does the music appear on numerous professional repertoire lists?
6. Does the music appear on international, state, or regional “Solo and Ensemble” required or recommended performance lists?

ITEA STANDARD LITERATURE SELECTION COMMITTEE

Dr. Mark S. Cox, chair
Professor of Tuba and Euphonium, Central Michigan University
Tuba and Euphonium Solo Lists

Dr. Mark Carlson
Associate Professor of Music, Mount St. Mary’s University
Euphonium Solo List

Dr. Mary Jo Cox
Collaborative Artist: Falcone Festival; ITEC; IWBC, MWRTEC
Piano ratings: Tuba and Euphonium Solo Lists

Dr. Seth Fletcher
Low Brass Artist and Educator; www.EuphoniumUnlimited.com
Euphonium Solo List

Drew Jones
Undergraduate Tuba Performance and Music Education Major, CMU
Assistant to the Chair

Dr. Jamie Lipton
Associate Professor of Low Brass, Henderson State University
Euphonium Solo List

Dr. Steven Maxwell
Associate Professor of Tuba and Euphonium, Kansas State University
Tuba and Euphonium Solo Lists

Dr. Matthew Mireles
Assistant Professor, Director of Bands and Low Brass, Cameron University
Euphonium Solo List

Dr. Jesse Orth
Instructor of Tuba and Euphonium, University of Northern Iowa
Tuba and Euphonium Solo Lists

Dr. Joel Pugh
Instructor of Low Brass, University of North Dakota
Euphonium Solo List

Patty Welch
Music Education – Grades 7-12 West Irondequoit Central School District
Tuba and Euphonium Solo List

CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING PIANO RATINGS

Dr. Mary Jo Cox

Working together with a pianist should be a rewarding experience. A good pianist helps to make the music come alive and provides both support and inspiration for the soloist. Recognizing that it would be helpful for both teachers and soloists to know the level of difficulty of the piano part when choosing music, piano parts have been rated and divided into three categories: Easy, Medium, and Difficult. “Easy” piano parts should be able to be performed by anyone with basic piano competency; these pieces are sight-readable by advanced pianists. Those pieces in the “Medium” category present more technical challenges and require more facility. “Difficult” pieces present challenges that require advanced technique and musicianship. Many factors were taken into consideration during the ratings process. The main characteristics that resulted in inclusion in each category are presented below.

EASY
• Mainly homophonic textures

• Limited chromaticism/primarily diatonic writing

• More complicated voicing and textures occur only in very slow tempi

• Few challenges in putting together piano and solo parts

MEDIUM
• Octaves, leaps, or passage work that requires a stronger technique

• Frequent chromaticism

• An “easy” piece with non-idiomatic or awkward writing may be categorized as “medium”

• Moderate challenges in putting together piano and solo parts

DIFFICULT
• Advanced technique required for octave passages, repeated notes or chords, passage work

• Extreme chromaticism

• Coordination between pianist and soloist is challenging

• Demands a high level of interpretation and musicianship

• Awkward or non-idiomatic piano writing

• Extended piano techniques

• E = Easy

• M = Medium

• D = Difficult

• U = Unaccompanied

CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING PIANO RATINGS

• NA = Not Applicable (there is no piano part available; may be scored for other instruments

COLLECTION KEY

EUPHONIUM SOLO COLLECTION CHART

COLLECTION TITLEABBREV.PUBLISHING COMPANYEDITOR

Baritone B. C. Soloist

BBCS

Belwin Mills

Weber, Fred

Classic Festival Solos for Baritone Volume 1

CFSB V1

Alfred Publishing Co.

Lamb, Jack

Classic Festival Solos for Baritone Volume 2

CFSB V2

Alfred Publishing Co.

Lamb, Jack

Classic Festival Solos for Trombone Volume 1

CFST V1

Alfred Publishing Co.

Lamb, Jack

Classic Festival Solos for Trombone Volume 1

CFST V2

Alfred Publishing Co.

Lamb, Jack

Classical Solos for Baritone

CSB

Hal Leonard

Sparke, Philip

Concert and Contest Collection – Baritone

CCCB

Rubank Inc.

Voxman, Himie

Concert and Contest Collection – Trombone

CCCT

Rubank Inc.

Voxman, Himie

Ditson Album of Solos for Trombone or Baritone

DAS

Oliver Ditson Co.

Page, N. Clifford

Easy Play-Along Solos

EPS

Kendor Music

Lowden, Bob

H. A. VanderCook Solo Collection

VSC

Carl Fisher

VanderCook, H. A.

Kendor Master Repertoire

KMR

Kendor Music

Salzman, Michael

Master Solos, Intermediate Level

MS

Hal Leonard

Perantoni, Daniel

New Concert Studies for Euphonium, Volume 1

NCSE V1

deHaske

Mead, Steven

Soloists Folio

SF

Rubank Inc.; Hal Leonard

Various

Solo Sounds for Trombone Volume 1, Levels 1-3

SST V1 L1-3

Alfred Publishing Co.

Lamb, Jack

Solo Sounds for Trombone Volume 1, Levels 3-5

SST V1 L3-5

Alfred Publishing Co.

Lamb, Jack

Steven Mead Presents: The Classical Euphonium

SMPCE

deHaske

Steven Mead

Steven Mead Presents: The Classical Euphonium

SMPCE

deHaske

Steven Mead

Steven Mead Presents: 20 Dances for Euphonium

SMP20

deHaske

Steven Mead

Steven Mead Presents: 20 Dances for Euphonium

SMP20

deHaske

Steven Mead

Solos for Trombone

SFT

Carl Fisher

Raph, Alan

The Clarinet Institute – Euphonium Solos

TCI

www.clarinetinstitute.com

Schorr, David

Trombone Gems Series

TGS

Hal Leonard

VanderCook, H. A.

Trombone Solos, Level 1

TS L1

Belwin; Alfred Publishing Co.

Various

Trombone Solos, Level 2

TS L2

Belwin; Alfred Publishing Co.

Various

VanderCook Solo Collection for Trumpet

VSC

Carl Fisher

VanderCook, H. A.

TUBA SOLO COLLECTION KEY

COLLECTION TITLEABBREV.PUBLISHING COMPANYEDITOR

Christmas Cameos

ChC

Kendor Music

Conley, Lloyd

Classic Festival Solos for Tuba, Volume 1

CFS V1

Alfred Publishing Co.

Lamb, Jack

Classic Festival Solos for Tuba, Volume 2

CFS V2

Alfred Publishing Co.

Lamb, Jack

Classical Solos for Tuba

CST

Hal Leonard

Sparke, Philip

Concert Album for Tuba

CAT

Edition Musicus

Ostrander, Allen

Concert and Contest Collection – Tuba

CCC

Rubank Inc.

Voxman, Himie

Eight Easy Pieces

EEP

Southern Music Co.

Voxman, Himie

First Solos for the Tuba Player

FSTP

G. Schirmer; Hal Leonard

Wekselblatt,  Herbert

Kendor Master Repertoire

KMR

Kendor Music

Salzman, Michael

Kendor Recital Solos – Tuba, 10 Grade, 1-2 Solos

KRS

Kendor Music

Various

Master Solos, Intermediate Level

MSI

Hal Leonard

Perantoni, Daniel

Soloists Folio

SF

Rubank Inc.; Hal Leonard

Various

Solo Sounds for Tuba, Volume 1, Levels 1-3

SST V1 L1-3

Alfred Publishing Co.

Lamb, Jack

Solo Sounds for Tuba, Volume 1, Levels 3-5

SST V1 L3-5

Alfred Publishing Co.

Lamb, Jack

Solos for the Tuba Player

STP

G. Schirmer; Hal Leonard

Wekselblatt,  Herbert

The Clarinet Institute – Tuba Solos

TCI

www.clarinetinstitute.com

Schorr, David

The Greatest Solo Songbook – Tuba

TGSS

PlayinTime Productions – The Yamaha Advantage

Feldstein, Sandy; Clark, Larry

Tuba Solos, Level 1

TS L1

Belwin; Alfred Publishing Co.

Various

William Bell Tuba Solo Collection, The

WBTSC

Carl Fisher

Bell, William